Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joyce Brand's avatar

All that talk of protecting democracy, from both sides! Democracy was supposed to mean rule by the people, but what we have ain't that. Forcing people to pick a team, especially when there are only two recognized teams, is the opposite of allowing "the people" to rule themselves.

True rule by the people means recognizing that there is no one "will of the people" because people are individuals, not a hive mind (even when the team forces them to act like a hive mind). It means getting command and control government out of the way and allowing people to vote with their actions--the choices individuals make.

It means having a free market in government services--the services that people think they need a government to provide. There is no reason for public goods to be provided by coercive, political government. That includes the public goods of rule-making and legal structures.

Free cities allow individuals to rule by giving them choices in the rules they want to live under. Some free cities will win more votes than others, but there is the potential for successful cities that cater to a minority of the people, who are therefore ruling themselves in a real sense.

Expand full comment
MCL's avatar

Well done. Thorough. I suspect many of us share this vast disconnect between many family member's beliefs and our own. Highly coordinated propaganda from mainstream news outlets seems like the lynch pin. It may also be the best target for attack vectors.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts