Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Swami's avatar

Seems like Rosenberg is unaware of the well-documented distinctions between dominance status and prestige status. Dominance status is ubiquitous in social species, and many of his arguments do apply here. Prestige hierarchies or status, OTOH, can be extremely positive sum when aimed in socially constructive directions such as who is most honest, most reliable, best under pressure, and so on. I would even suggest that larger scale cooperation depends upon prestige hierarchies and status.

Expand full comment
Salango's avatar

I love how you brought up this topic. Humans are like status-seeking machines. It's built right into our evolutionary core. But when you mentioned the car example, something took over my mind. It was an old book called 'Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind,' and I just realized that this exercise of getting on certain category pre-installs in people's heads is really similar to that process.

Another thing I'd like to add is to drop comparison in our own minds. That's possible. Osho turned off the automatic comparison I grew up with by using a simple example that has stuck with me since then: 'An old wise man once challenged an almighty king. The challenge was simple: the old man drew a line in the sand and then told the king to make it bigger without touching it. Using all his resources and greatest genius, the king gave up after many attempts. That's when the old man got close to the line and drew another, smaller line.' THAT'S WHEN IT HIT ME. JEEZ. Bigger, smaller, better, worse—it was all in my mind. Existence just IS. But our mind only comprehends things in comparison to other things.

And before I finish this, I just realized that... Status creates incentives... A university degree and a title are quite appealing forces for most people. I wonder how we can break that spell for other people.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts